This page will show all objects that are named GeForce, and if possible sorted on production date.
Click on the blue name(s) or picture(s) below for detailed information, pictures and benchmarks (if available).
This page will show all objects that are named GeForce, and if possible sorted on production date.
Click on the blue name(s) or picture(s) below for detailed information, pictures and benchmarks (if available).
A GeForce FX from the time when the GeForce FX was still nVidia's flagship GPU. The 5200 was the low-end card, however. This XFX GeForce FX 5200 performs quite well in 5200-terms: it has a 128-bit memory interface with memory clocked at 166MHz (DDR333). A lot of GeForce FX 5200 cards only have a 64-... > Read more
A review sample from nVidia. It uses early A1-revision hardware and comes with a fancy nVidia aluminum box. This card is pretty much the roots of the final NV40 product. Just before nVidia sent these samples to reviewers a bug popped up regarding the fan-control. Due to this a small modification has... > Read more
The PCI-Express version of the GeForce 6800 Ultra. The NV45 chip is identical to the NV40 (AGP version). To get it working with the PCI-e bus, nVidia installed a bridge chip right next to the NV40 chip.... > Read more
The successor of the GeForce 6800 Ultra. nVidia codenamed this card G70 rather than NV50 (6800 Ultra is codenamed NV40). The 7800 GTX made quite some improvements in both performance and image quality.
I've created a short time-line about the G70:
22 February 2005
Some references to NVID... > Read more
With the GeForce 6-series nVidia was back on track. The 6600 GT was a mid-range card with a 128-bit memory bus. Due to high clock frequencies the card performed quite well, and with some older games, very good. The 6600-series always had higher clocks compared to their 6800 counterparts. nVidia buil... > Read more
Not sure which brand this card is. FX 5200-DV256 looks like an AOpen part number but usually AOpen gives their cards more branding. I also found one reference to 'Apollo' but I'm not sure about that.
Nevertheless; a PCB-date of week01 of 2006. When this card was new in 2003 it wasn't really the s... > Read more
The graphics card I used in my main workstation for quite a while. It's a decent card that runs great with Windows 7 and Mac OS X.
Both technical and performance-wise it's all fine as well. These G92-based cards don't seem to summer from problems with the ball-soldering like the G80's or 8400M mo... > Read more
Somewhere late 2009 or early 2010 I bought this card new. It ended up in my home-server and ran 24/7 for 10 years until I replaced it with a more power efficient Volari Z11 card.
To this day I never tested the 3D-part of this card since it only ran in my server that's accessed through RDP. Of cou... > Read more