This page will show all objects that are named Celeron, and if possible sorted on production date.
Click on the blue name(s) or picture(s) below for detailed information, pictures and benchmarks (if available).
This page will show all objects that are named Celeron, and if possible sorted on production date.
Click on the blue name(s) or picture(s) below for detailed information, pictures and benchmarks (if available).
I have three Celeron 266's: this SL2SY, a boxed SL2YN and a CPU only SL2YN. The SL2SY is the OEM-version and didn't come with Intel's shroud-cooling solution.
Somehow I've liked the first Celeron's for it's box-ar... > Read more
As stated here the Covington-based Celeron is not a wonderful performer. It does it's job but the lack of L2-cache is noticeable in multi-tasking and specific applications/games.
However, due te absent L2-cache it is a highly overclockable processor. My C... > Read more
Technically a dreadful CPU! It's basically a Pentium II (which doesn't sound to bad) but without L2 cache. It has none, nothing. This impacts overall performance of the CPU and above all: it feels slow when running Windows '98. Surprisingly some benchmarks are nearly as fast as a Pentium II 233. I s... > Read more
The Celeron as it should be. The first Celeron ever released didn't have L2 cache at all making it cheap to produce but quite slow. Intel changed this by adding 128KB full-speed on-die L2 cache into it's playground. This time the cache ran at 100% of the core clockfrequency (333MHz in this case) and... > Read more
Same as this Celeron 333 but someone once removed the heatsink/fan (Shroud) solution.
My experiences with the Intel heatsink/fan are quite good. They seem to be reliable and do it's job just fine. Perhaps someone removed the stock heatsink/fan to upgrade ... > Read more
The Celeron like it should be. The 300MHz Celeron was also available with the 'Covington' core that is slower because it lacks L2-cache. This particular Celeron 300A is based on the 'Mendocino'-core that has 128KB full-speed L2-cache integrated. You can identify the differences by the A-designation ... > Read more
Similar to this Celeron 333 but 33MHz faster. Performance-wise the Celeron 366 runs in the neighborhood of the Pentium II 350.
As with all the lower clocked Mendocino Celerons (300, 333, 366) they all overclock pretty good. 412MHz/75FSB and 456MHz/83FSB a... > Read more
I have three Celeron 366's:
1. This one with sSpec SL35S that was a Boxed CPU without heatsink.
2. The SL36C which is identical but for OEM's (came in trays).
3. A Slot 1 variant. It also has an A-stepping core.
... > Read more
Technically this Celeron 400 is just like the 366MHz slot 1 variant but then in socket form.
The Celeron 400 was a good performer and could still run in the older slot 1 boards using a slotket adapter.... > Read more
A boxed version of the first Celeron series. Basically the Celeron Covington is a Pentium II without L2-cache. This reduces production costs but also causes performance to drop. No L2-cache at all is not good. It's successor, the Celeron Mendocino, had 128K2 full-speed on-die cache which greatly imp... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 433 in terms of functionality and stepping (both B0). The only difference is that the sSpec code: this one has SL3BS which once was shipped in an Intel box with Intel heatsink/fan. The SL3BA sSpec was delivered in trays for OEM's.... > Read more
The Celeron 333 sold in both slot 1 and socket 370 variants. Back in the day of the Pentium II, slot 1 was used for Intels' latest processors. using slot 1 Intel could move the L2-cache right next to the processor rather than on the motherboard. This is called off-die L2-cache and was faster than L2... > Read more
Just running at 500MHz; nothing less, nothing more. It is the second fastest Celeron 'Mendocino'. It was surpassed by the 533MHz version and with the 566MHz models Intel used the newer Coppermine core.
This particular CPU (with sSpec SL3LQ) once came in an Intel boxed with heatsink/fan included.... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 366 except that this CPU was shipped in a tray rather than an official Intel box.... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 400 but with a different sSpec. The sSpec indicates that this CPU once came in an Intel box (with heatsink/fan).
In it's day the Celeron 400 was a nice performer. In most cases faster than the competing AMD K6/2-400. The Celeron ... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 533 but with different sSpec: the SL3PZ came in an Intel box with heatsink/fan included.... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 500 but with a different sSpec. This particular CPU came in trays rather than an original Intel box.... > Read more
Just as the Celeron 400 but 33MHz faster. Just as with the Celeron 333/366 and 400, the 433 was an interesting CPU in price/performance. Even when overclocking you could often increase the FSB to 75 or 83MHz without too much hassle. This would result in resp... > Read more
Although I do like the Celeron 'Mendocino' as cool running and overclockable CPU (especially with the lower clocked CPU's) this particular 466MHz part was not spectacular in the 12th week of 2000 since you could already get a 1000MHz Athlon at that time. Of course at extra cost .
The 466 was of... > Read more
The same as this 566 Celeron. Even the sSpec number is the same. I bought this CPU because I didn't have a working 566 model for the benchmarks.... > Read more
Identical to this Celeron 466 but with different sSpec number. The SL3EH was a CPU that came on trays rather than an Intel box that included a heatsink/fan.... > Read more
The fastest black PPGA Celeron available but unfortunatly still with a slow 66MHz front side bus (FSB). When the 333MHz Celeron was new, the 66MHz FSB was adequate. I guess the Celeron in the range of 500 - 550MHz could benefit nicely from a 100MHz front-side-bus but that's how thing go with a budge... > Read more
Unlike the Celeron at 500MHz or 533MHz this one has been made with the so called 'Coppermine' core. It's made on a 180nm manufacturing process and because of this it can run at higher clock frequencies with less voltage.
The Coppermine CPU's on socket 370 are also FC-PGA rather than PGA. FC stand... > Read more
Like the 566 and 600 model but faster and still with the slow 66MHz bus. Luckily the Celeron was quite energy efficient so it was not bad for notebooks.... > Read more
I can't really say anything about this CPU. Just like the 566, 633 and 667 models they were probably sold in quite some quantities but in reality they got out-performed by AMD's Duron.... > Read more
Both the Celeron 667 and the Pentium III 667 are made using a 180nm Coppermine core. The difference can be found in the front side bus and L2-cache size. Let's see how this affects the performance in the benchmarks.... > Read more
An engineering sample Celeron with an 100MHz front side bus. Luckily Intel stopped increasing the multiplier of the older 66MHz bus versions because they will eventually reach a point that the front side bus is getting to slow.... > Read more
An ordinary, run of the mill, Celeron CPU. Not very spectacular, not the slowest (533MHz) in it's line nor the fastest (1100). These usually ended up in budget systems could run Office applications fair enough .... > Read more
The first Celeron with 100MHz bus. The 766 model was starting to lack bandwidth due the slower 66MHz bus, and AMD's Duron was rocketing along with far greater performance. Intel tried to close the gap a bit by using a faster bus.... > Read more
A Celeron at the 1GHz mark; a good thing for marketing and business. The processor did it's job but was nowhere as fast as a Duron.... > Read more
No, this is not a 'Tualatin' as many would think because they see a heatspreader. This is a FC-PGA2 'Coppermine' CPU which is also known as the Coppermine-T. As since all FC-PGA2 CPU's have a heatspreader, this CPU has one too.
A little story on the PPGA, FC-PGA and FC-PGA2:
PPGA stands for Plas... > Read more
A qualification sample of Intel's Celeron 1100 with 'Tualatin'-core. It runs at 1100MHz and doesn't need as much voltage as the older Pentium III / Celeron CPU's because the Tualatin is made with the 130nm manufacturing process.... > Read more
I have another Celeron 533 with the same sSpec number. The one I had didn't work so I decided to go for another CPU. Besides being identical this 533 is made in the 6th week of 2002 which makes it a pretty late model for a Mendocino-core based Celeron. Back ... > Read more
A very late Intel Celeron 1.8GHz engineering sample. The Willamette core was released in 2000 and this sample, with the last Willamette-revision (E0) is from 2002! ... > Read more
An engineering sample of a not-so-very-speedy Celeron. This Celeron is based on the same core as the Pentium 4 Willamette but only has 128KB L2-cache instead of 256KB L2-cache. Because the 'Netburst' architecture has a long pipeline a big L2-cache is useful and this CPU doesn't have a big L2-cache; ... > Read more
A new version of the Celeron; the 'Tualatin' made on the 130nm process with 256KB L2-cache. It out-performs both the Celeron and more expensive Pentium III with the 'Coppermine' core. It's a fine CPU but by the time it was sold (this CPU is from 19th week of 2002), better CPU's we're available. Both... > Read more
Like the Intel Celeron 1100A but 100MHz faster and about half a year newer.... > Read more
Just a Celeron at 1700MHz; not much spectacular and perfomance wise. Perhaps only interesting for Office applications.... > Read more
As opposed of this Celeron 1.8, this one is a normal production version.... > Read more
A 2GHz Celeron with a little L2-cache. Nothing spectacular and only suitable for light Office work.
For this CPU it's the same as with the Celeron 2.2 GHz; I can't really think of a reason to buy this kind of CPU halfway 2003.... > Read more
One of the last Celeron 'Northwood' iterations. It's brother ticks at 2800MHz and all higher clocked Celeron CPU's are based on Prescott (90nm, max. 3,33GHz) or Cedar Mill (65nm, max 3,6GHz).... > Read more
This CPU was made during the 41th week of 2003. Consider that the 3,06GHz Pentium 4 was available at the end of 2002 and CPU's like 2,66 ~ 2,8GHz Pentium 4 or Athlon XP 2600+ were more than mainstream. Because the Celeron with Northwood core was never a good performer (in mainstream, some light offi... > Read more
Just like this Celeron 2.2GHz but 200MHz faster. This 2400MHz part is has been made in the end of 2003 when much faster parts like the Athlon64 3200+ and Pentium 4 3GHz were already available.... > Read more
Based on the Conroe-L core. It's basically a single-core Core 2 Duo CPU with less L2-cache and a slower FSB.
As far as I know there is no production version/model of this CPU available. The fastest Celeron in this series is the Celeron 450, running at 2.2GHz.
My ASRock P45XE detects it as 'Gen... > Read more
Identical to the this Celeron 440 but one step slower.... > Read more
The second fastest Celeron (if you don't count engineering samples) with the Conroe-L core. It run's at 2GHz with just one core.
This CPU was sold at a low price and found it's way in low-budget systems. In practical terms it would outperform a Pentium 4 3GHz but in 2007/2008 it would've been nic... > Read more